Overcapitalized Hot Dog Vendor

Lianming Zhao v. JEH JOHNSON, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al.,Case No. SACV 13-1185-JVS (ANx)  (C.D. CA April 07, 2014) tells us very little other than an I-526 got denied, lost its AAO Appeal, and the District Court determined that USCIS’s decision on June 25, 2013, to deny Plaintiff’s I-526 petition, should be AFFIRMED in full.

There were two I-526 AAO Dismissals posted for that date.  Both were California businesses.

Items that the District Court Judgment included (count-label error in original) that help narrow it down are:

(3) That United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) correctly determined that Plaintiff failed to comply with 8 C.F.R. § 204.6(j)(2) to demonstrate that the full amount of his capital investment was at risk;

(4) That USCIS correctly determined that Plaintiff failed to comply with 8 C.F.R. § 204.6(j)(4) to demonstrate that his capital investment created the

requisite number of full-time jobs for qualifying employees;

 

(4) That USCIS correctly determined that Plaintiff failed to meet his evidentiary burden to demonstrate eligibility for approval of his I-526 petition;

 

I believe it identifies: 

• JUN252013_01B7203.pdf  
• The grossly overcapitalized Hot Dog vendor.

Like 1 person likes this

Documents

1. Lianming Zhao v. JEH JOHNSON, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al.,Case No. SACV 13-1185-JVS (ANx) (C.D. CA April 07, 2014) (Lianming_Zhao_v._Janet_Napolitano_et_al_._C.D._CA_April_7_2014_I-526_Denial_Upheld.pdf)
2. Court Order--Summary Judgment for USCIS (22 pages) (Lianming_Zhao_March_31_2014_Order_for_Summary_Judgment_22_pagesx.pdf)

Tags

EB-5 I-526